Login
Login

Talk:Doki Doki Literature Club!/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Doki Doki Literature Club!/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Doki Doki Literature Club!/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: OliverEastwood (talk · contribs) 04:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
height=50|GA review
{{small|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}}
#It is reasonably well written.

  1. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. :a (references): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    c (OR): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  4. It is broad in its coverage.
  5. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    b (focused): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  6. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  7. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|yes}}
  8. It is stable.
  9. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|yes}}
  10. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  11. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|yes}}
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|yes}}
style="text-align:center;" |

Overall:

Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|yes}}

height=30|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px

Overall an excellent article. All criteria were met, and the article demonstrates a high standard of writing. The article is a bit wordy, however, this is to be expected from video game articles and doesn't cause the article to become any less focused. - OliverEastwood (talk) 04:09, 3 April 2019 (UTC)