Talk:Drupal/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Drupal/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Drupal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Waterfox ^~talk~ 21:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Status: {{Done|Pass}}. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 22:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

:I'll be revewing the article in the next few days. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 21:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{#if:|

---

|}}

1. Is it reasonably well written?
2. :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|+}}
3. :: {{#if:||}}
4. :B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: {{GAList/check|+}}
5. :: {{#if:||}}
6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
7. :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|+}}
8. :: {{#if:||}}
9. :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|+}}
10. :: {{#if:||}}
11. :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|+}}
12. :: {{#if:||}}
13. Is it broad in its coverage?
14. :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|+}}
15. ::
16. :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|+}}
17. :: {{#if:||}}
18. Is it neutral?
19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|+}}
20. :: {{#if:||}}
21. Is it stable?
22. : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|+}}
23. :: {{#if:||}}
24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
25. :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|+}}
26. :: {{#if:||}}
27. :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|+}}
28. :: {{#if:||}}
29. Overall:
30. :{{Done|Pass}}
31. ::