Talk:Exosquad/GA1

GA Reassessment

{{al|{{#titleparts:Exosquad/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Exosquad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

My main concern is the sourcing quality:

Several unreliable or unreliable-looking sources:
[http://epguides.com/Exosquad/ Epguides.com]
Evabeast.com (offline)
Storyboardpro.com
Several citations to [http://www.stwing.upenn.edu/~pdanner/exo/intro.html this] fansite which does not appear authoritative or reputable
A trivia section on TV.com, which is user submitted
Toonarific, which is also user submitted
[http://exosquad.virtue.nu/cdrom.html This] personal website.

Also, there are several unsourced statements throughout, some dating from 2009. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

:Sure, whatever. --Koveras ^☭ 05:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Oh wait, I misread the instructions. Since I did an individual reassessment, I can delist it myself. Koveras removed the {{tl|maintained}} tag from the talk page, implying that he no longer seems interested in maintaining the page. For that, I will delist it as a GA due to serious concerns with bad source quality. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:06, 26 January 2013 (UTC)