Login
Login

Talk:Fabian Cancellara/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Fabian Cancellara/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Fabian Cancellara/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MadGeographer (talk · contribs) 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

This is a very good (and detailed) article.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  3. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  4. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  5. It is broad in its coverage.
  6. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  7. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  8. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  9. It is stable.
  10. :No edit wars: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  11. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  12. :Appropriate use with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  13. Overall:
  14. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  15. ::I think you've done a great job here! Note: this is my first GA review, so in case I missed something, additional comments are welcome (although I really don't see anything now that could prevent this article from being listed at GA). mgeo talk 20:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

yeah your first ork. and if there are any questions, just write to presse(at)infrontringier.ch . this article is ridiculous. cancelara is obvious part of...ahwww ya know what. i go to sleep. at last - he´ll be armstronged. if not, he´ll pantani himself :D. bye 217.191.51.229 (talk) 05:09, 8 July 2015 (UTC)