Talk:Famine in India/GA3

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:Famine in India/GA3|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Famine in India/GA3. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ankit Maity 03:58, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?{{GAList/check|aye}}

A. Prose quality:

Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

Not too enamored with the mass of links for See also

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?{{GAList/check|aye}}

A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:

Is it broad in its coverage?{{GAList/check|aye}}

A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:

Is it neutral?{{GAList/check|aye}}

Fair representation without bias:

Is it stable?{{GAList/check|aye}}

No edit wars, etc:

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?{{GAList/check|aye}}

A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:{{GAList/check|aye}}