Login
Login

Talk:French battleship Démocratie/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:French battleship Démocratie/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:French battleship Démocratie/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 15:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

;reveiw

A very nice article. I made a few minor edits which you're free to revert.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=French_battleship_D%C3%A9mocratie&diff=512685946&oldid=512201807]

I've only a few comments:

  • "She displaced up to 14,489 metric tons (14,260 long tons; 15,971 short tons) at full load. She had a crew of between 739 and 769 officers and enlisted men. She was powered by three vertical triple expansion engines with twenty-two Belleville boilers. " three sentences in a row start with "She".
  • "Démocratie 22.7 percent hits," - is there a word left out here?

Otherwise all is fine. will put on hold while you look over my comments.

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 16:45, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

:Both should be fixed now, thanks for reviewing the article! Parsecboy (talk) 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
  2. :a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:{{GAList/check|y}}
  3. ::
  4. :b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, summary style and list incorporation: {{GAList/check|y}}
  5. ::
  6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
  7. :a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout: {{GAList/check|y}}
  8. ::
  9. :b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
  10. ::
  11. :c. no original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. ::
  13. Is it broad in its coverage?
  14. :a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic: {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. ::
  16. :b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style): {{GAList/check|y}}
  17. ::
  18. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
  19. :fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  20. ::
  21. Is it stable?
  22. : no edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
  23. ::
  24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
  25. :a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
  26. ::
  27. :b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
  28. ::
  29. Overall:
  30. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  31. :: pass!
  32. ::

Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2012 (UTC)