Talk:George Rolph/GA1

GA Review

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. EF5 20:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:George Rolph/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:George Rolph/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Z1720}} 19:09, 30 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: EF5 (talk · contribs) 14:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this shortly! :) EF5 14:06, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|EF5}} Reminder ping. Z1720 (talk) 04:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

::Sorry, I had a relatively severe case of the flu. I'll get to it today. :) EF5 13:19, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

The table:

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. :: No issues in particular that stand out to me. The second lead paragraph is bulky and could be split into a third, but that is just my opinion.
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
  5. :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}} b (inline citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}} d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
  6. :: Because every source is one I can't access, I have to AGF on plagiarism and verifiability, but it seems legitimate.
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  9. :: Talks about his life (albeit relatively briefly) and his political career, so I see no major issues.
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. :: Isn't promotional in tone nor does the article use weasel words.
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  15. :: No recent edit wars.
  16. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
  18. :: There is one image, and it seems to be licensed properly.
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  21. :: Good job! Usually I have things to point out, but I really see nothing that needs fixed. :) EF5 20:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}