Talk:German cruiser Karlsruhe/GA1

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|y|OK. Spotchecks for copyright problems all clear.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|?|* Suggest changing the first section header to "Characteristics" (to conform with the approach on her sister ships) rather than "Design", unless this is something specific to a lead ship.
* Also, I really think the first sentence needs to be more comprehensive in terms of defining the subject. It is a very short sentence and doesn't really provide much information. What about something like "Karlsruhe was a German light cruiser that was operated between 1929 and April 1940, including service in World War II. (was she the lead vessel in her class? I thought that was Königsberg?) She was operated by two German navies, ..."
* I have a query about the format of the article title. According to WP:NCSHIP Karlsruhe should be italicised in the title.
* Also, the KMS in the infobox is not consistent with her sister ships (one doesn't have a prefix there, one has DKM. It was my understanding that Kriegsmarine ships didn't have a formal prefix, but that some authors use them. Perhaps it would be better to be consistent with the article title and drop the prefix?

}}

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

{{GATable/item|2a|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|y|OK

}}

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|4|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|5|y|OK

}}

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|?|File:Karlsruhe h99643.jpg appears to need a US licence.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|y|OK

}}

{{GATable/item|7|pass|Review complete, on hold for seven days to address criteria Passed.

}}