Login
Login

Talk:Google Earth/GA1

GA Review

{{Archive top|result={{GAList/check|nay}} Fail --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)|status=Resolves}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Google Earth/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Google Earth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 08:18, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|???}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  3. ::
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|nay}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  6. ::
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  9. ::
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  12. ::
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  15. ::
  16. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  18. ::
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|nay}}
  21. ::

Add citations wherever marked {{cn}}. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 08:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

:Along with that, some questions:

:*Some pedestrian walkways and private roads are signified by transparent white lines, especially when greatly resembling a road intended for public automotive traffic.

:-- I don't get what is white and transparent.

:*Google Earth Engine is a separate product, not a part of Google Earth.

:-- If it's why have this part at all?

:--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 08:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

::I just removed that section about the engine, undo it if I did wrong. Numbermaniac - T- C 22:26, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

::Oh, and reference 14 has a minor problem. Numbermaniac - T- C 22:27, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

:::I corrected that ref for you.

:::And please add those sources wherever marked {{tl|cn}}. If you can't find sources, please cancel the statements. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 11:41, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

::::Correct the problems addressed in the editor tag in the para of Google_Earth#Mac_version. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 11:47, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

:::::*The words "current", "recent" & "to date" should be removed as they become outdated. (GA criteria).

:::::*Remove Peacock Terms, such as "significant" and "important". (GA criteria)

:::::*The lead should adequately summarize the content of the article. (GA criteria) --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:03, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

::::::You have 7 days to try and fix this article.--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

----

Setting article review "on hold".--Ankit MaityTalkContribs 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

----

I'll have to see what I can do. I'm hoping others might help too.Numbermaniac - T- C 08:59, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Comment by non-reviewer -- this GAN should've been immediately failed for containing 22 tags for citation and two outstanding cleanup banners. @Numbermaniac What the heck were you thinking when you nominated the article? You're not a major contributor to the article. In fact, you've only made ONE (1) edit on the article. You're wasting everyone's time here. Geez --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 07:34, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

:I added those {{tlx|cn}} tags. However, what you said is perfectly correct. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

::The article is thus failed for the GA status. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 12:10, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

{{Archive bottom}}