Talk:Gotha WD.11/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Gotha WD.11/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Gotha WD.11/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 00:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 00:22, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

• Cockpit is a duplicated link
• Fixed--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:05, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
• Article is stable
• Images correctly licensed
• Earwig reports copyvio unlikely

• "only sinking"
• "Fewer than half survived the war to be inventoried by the Allies after the war."

• Suggest linking the Action of 22 September 1914
• "but only the forward observer could flown if a torpedo was carried" something missing here
• A word or two on the configuration of the cockpits would be useful - you mention the forward observer cockpit but we aren't provided with the positions of the other to compare it with (it isn't clear from the images)

• "The mission was generally unsuccessful" not sure why "generally" is required here? Were any bombs dropped?
• Was Saint-Pol-sur-Mer a military airfield? Probably worth noting
• "the following evening" suggest adding the date here because it's been a while since the last was provided
• "surprised two cargo ships" to avoid too many pairs
• "caused one of the aircraft"
• Link Operation Albion
• Do we know exactly how the rescuing floatplane and crew were lost? Sounds like an interesting episode
• I was confusing two separate incidents on that same day.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
• Did the commander die in a WD.11 related accident?
• "action on 4 October later when two small minelayers"
• Link Gotha WD.14
• "The weather was generally not suitable"
• Do we know whether the Dutch WD.11 was the rescue plane or the original craft that made the emergency landing? Might be worth mentioning that saga in a little more detail again here for context
• This should be a little clearer now.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

• "In service the German pilots found the WD.11 too fragile for the heavy weights that it needed to carry, specially while taking off or landing." needs a citation
• The Operators section really needs a citation for the sake of completion
• References look OK. AGF for print sources.

{{ping|Sturmvogel 66}} Hi, an interesting article! That's all I have for now. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 12:08, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

:I think that I've addressed all of these; see if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:52, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

::Passing this article as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:03, 31 January 2024 (UTC)