Talk:Greece in the Eurovision Song Contest 2017/GA1
GA Review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Onegreatjoke (talk · contribs) 16:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
{{pb}}
Hello! I'm Onegreatjoke and i'm here to review another one of your nominations. Comments will come tomorrow. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:30, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
:Prose has been addressed and spotchecks are all clear. passing! Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:14, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : c. (OR): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- It is broad in its coverage.
- : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : b. (focused): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- It is stable.
- : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y }}
- ::
- ::
- Overall:
- : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check| }}
- ::
- ::
(Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)
=Prose=
Background
- "by the renaming of NERIT as ERT" Should it be the "by renaming NERIT to ERT" or something similar because that seems weirdly worded.
Artist Selection
- "Previously the broadcaster had said that they would select the entry internally, however they reconsidered, seeing Ellinikós Telikós, the Greek selection event, as a revenue source." I feel like it should either be "...entry internally, however, they reconsidered," or "...entry internally. However, they reconsidered,"
- "...with her song to be selected though a three-song national final." should be through.
Ellinikós Telikós 2017
- "was televised on ERT1, ERT HD and ERT World as well as" should be a comma after ERT HD.
- "Former Eurovision contestants Sergey Lazarev, Helena Paparizou, Ani Lorak and Sakis Rouvas also appeared on screen" comma after Ani Lorak.
Preparations and promotion
- "final version of the song and its accompanying music video were revealed on 13 March" feel like 'was' is a better thing to say there than were.
- "promoted the song throughout Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland." comma after Denmark.
At Eurovision
- "(France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom)" comma after Spain.
- "were televised in Greece on ERT1, ERT HD and ERT World" Comma after ERT HD.
Performances
- "featured Demy standing on a leveled podium and a hologram screen which appeared in front of the singer" I feel that it would be better to replace 'which' with 'that'.
- "Demy was joined by three off-stage backing vocalists: Erasmia Markidi, Evgenia Liakou and Paris Paraskevadis-Planets." comma after Evgenia Liakou.
Voting
- "two sets of points from 1-8, 10 and 12:" comma after 10.
- "and the overall impression by the act." I think 'by' should be replaced with 'of'.
- "Vicky Gerotheodorou (jury chairperson), Xenia Ghali, Dimitris Ouggarezos [el], Akis Anastasiadis and Aris Petrakis." comma after Akis Anastasiadis.
That seems to be all for prose! Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
:{{ping|Onegreatjoke}} the above have been addressed. Grk1011 (talk) 01:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
::{{ping|Onegreatjoke}} checking in just in case this fell off your radar. Grk1011 (talk) 02:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
:::I'll see if I can work on this tomorrow. Onegreatjoke (talk) 02:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
===Spotchecks===
- [1] looks good.
- [8] looks good.
- [9] looks good.
- [10] looks good.
- [14 and 15] Looks good.
- [18 and 19] looks good.
- [27 and 28] looks good.
- [47] looks good.
- [44] looks good.
Spotchecks look alright Onegreatjoke (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
{{abot}}