Talk:Greg Jensen/GA1

GA review

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:38, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Greg Jensen/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Greg Jensen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|BeanieFan11}} 23:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 02:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 02:05, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:I'll get to this monday. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 03:15, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
height=50 | GA review
{{small|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}}
#It is reasonably well written.

  1. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}}
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
  3. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}}
    b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}}
    c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
    d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
  4. It is broad in its coverage.
  5. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}}
    b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  6. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  7. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  8. It is stable.
  9. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  10. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  11. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}}
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
style="text-align:center;" |

Overall:

Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}

height=30|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px

=Comments=

  • {{tq|He decided to return to the sport in 1986}}-->{{tq|He decided to return to football in 1986}}
  • {{tq|He was also used as a placekicker at Sauk Prairie}} (you could also probably combine this with the previous sentence using a semi-colon
  • Is "wrist-wrestling" different than "arm-wrestling"?
  • [https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-1-d&q=wrist+wrestling+vs+arm+wrestling Apparently].
  • {{tq|watched football and television}} "on telelvision"
  • {{tq|needing a player at the positions}} "at those positions"
  • {{tq|as a replacement, to play guard.}} comma isn't needed
  • {{tq|...with an ankle injury, and he was released...}} split into two sentences
  • References:
  • All appear consistently formatted and reliable for what is being cited
  • Spot checks: with only 9 sources, I checked them all

Nice work, can't wait for the DYK! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 14:59, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

  • {{ping|Gonzo fan2007}} I think I addressed everything. Will definitely take this to DYK! BeanieFan11 (talk) 21:31, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
  • Passed. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 13:38, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

{{abot}}