Talk:HMS Pearl (1762)/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:HMS Pearl (1762)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS Pearl (1762)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 16:12, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

I'll start this in the next few days.

• would help to define slop ship. no article on it. Otherwise, good. Minor edits [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Pearl_(1762)&diff=842328393&oldid=841560321 here] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=HMS_Pearl_(1762)&diff=842328836&oldid=842328393 here]. auntieruth (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
• :I've added an explanation in the form of a footnote (referenced of course!) Thanks for the review.--Ykraps (talk) 15:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
5. :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}} d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. ::
7. It is broad in its coverage.
8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
9. ::
10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. ::
13. It is stable.
14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. ::
16. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
17. :a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
18. ::
19. Overall:
20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
21. ::