Talk:Hilary Benn/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Hilary Benn/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Hilary Benn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: AlastairJHannaford (talk · contribs) 14:40, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"

|- style="vertical-align:top;"

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

|- style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|No|There is a litany of spelling and grammatical issues, making it hard to read and detracting from the content.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|No|On the lead section, it could be shortened to give it greater impact on the reader, as there is some repetition within it. The second paragraph must be re-worked as to be grammatically correct. The third paragraph could be rephrased to allow for it to read with greater ease.
Though not major, the title of the first section (Labour in government) on its own is grammatically poor, and also lacks flow in reading. The last sentence of the second paragraph (referring to Benn's constituency office) should be rephrased to read better.

}}

|- style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

{{GATable/item|2a|Yes|This is the case.

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|Yes|Everything is in order.

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|Yes|I believe this to be the case, as everything appears to be accurately cited.

}}

{{GATable/item|2d|Yes|I believe this to be the case, as everything appears to be accurately cited and in order.

}}

|- style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|No|This is an entry on a British politician, and his political views had been summed up as "Benn supports the maintenance of a nuclear-armed strategic force by the United Kingdom." While they have been added to, the impression that this article is incomplete still remains.

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|Yes|The article is to the point.

}}

{{GATable/item|4|Yes|It is written in a neutral manner.

}}

{{GATable/item|5|Yes|It is stable.

}}

|- style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|Yes|All are in order.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|Yes|This is the case.

}}

{{GATable/item|7|no|I am of the view, that while an effort was made to improve the article it still falls short of the criteria.

}}