Talk:Hugh Boustead/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 18:39, 14 August 2011 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
{{#if:|
|}}
- Is it reasonably well written?
- :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:Standardize retrieval date formats|Standardize retrieval date formats|}}
::: Done. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:Did he ever marry and/or have any children?|Did he ever marry and/or have any children?|}}
:::His obituary says that he was unmarried and none of the sources mention anything about his having any children. It's possible, of course, but I don't have any reliable sources for it. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:What was his rank in WWII? Was it local or substantive?|What was his rank in WWII? Was it local or substantive?|}}
:::It was local - clarified. Canadian Paul 01:59, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- Is it neutral?
- :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Is it stable?
- : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}
- Overall:
- :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :: {{#if:||}}