Talk:IMac G4/GA1

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:IMac G4/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:IMac G4/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|David Fuchs}} 18:28, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Vacant0 (talk · contribs) 16:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello! I'll be reviewing this article as part of the ongoing GAN backlog drive. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 16:14, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

• {{GAList/check|y}} There is unlikely any copyright violation in the article. Earwig's Copyvio Detector has reported only [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=IMac+G4&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0&use_engine=0 20.6% in similarity].
• {{GAList/check|y}} There are no cleanup banners, such as those listed at WP:QF, in the article.
• {{GAList/check|y}} The article is stable.
• {{GAList/check|y}} No previous GA reviews.

• {{GAList/check|y}} Prose, spelling, and grammar checking.
• No issues were found in the lede.
• "{{tq|15 inch, 17 inch, and 20 inch}}..." → 15-inch, 17-inch, and 20-inch...
• There is a missing space at the beginning of the second sentence in the last paragraph of the "Release" section.
• The rest of the article looks good. I did not find any grammar errors.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking whether the article complies with MOS.
• Optional: Add alt texts to the images in the article.
• Optional: I feel like the Specifications section should be somewhere more up in the article. Reception and legacy should be at the bottom.
• The article complies with the MOS:LEDE, MOS:LAYOUT, and MOS:WTW guidelines. There is no fiction and embedded lists within the article, so I am skipping MOS:WAF and MOS:EMBED.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking refs, verifiability, and whether there is original research.
• References section with a {{t|reflist}} template is present in the article.
• No referencing issues.
• Listed references are reliable. Good job on archiving refs.
• Spotchecked Ref 8, 9, 13, 23, 42, 47, 54, 67, 70–all verify the cited content. AGF on other citations.
• Optional: Fix the order of references in the text. "{{tq|[50][38][11]}}" → "[11][38][50]"
• Copyvio already checked.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking whether the article is broad in its coverage.
• I always like reading articles like this.
• "{{tq|although it can also boot into OS 9}}" Ref 9 mentions the reason, in order to access older Mac software. I feel like this could be added.
• The article addresses the main aspects, and it stays focused on the topic.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking whether the article is presented from an NPOV standpoint.
• The article meets the criteria and is written in encyclopedic language.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking whether the article is stable.
• As noted in the initial comments, the article has been stable.
• {{GAList/check|y}} Checking images.
• All looks good.

{{ping|David Fuchs}} Overall, a very good article. There are a couple of things to fix. Once this gets addressed, I'll promote the article. The review will be on hold for a week. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 13:59, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hey Vacant0, thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of the above except the comment about the specifications; at the end is where the wikiproject puts them. I'm not opposed to a different place for it, but I think that's a conversation beyond the scope of this GAN, as it would impact a lot of good and featured content (e.g. Power Mac G4 Cube, PowerBook 100.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ^talk 19:24, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

::Okay, good to know. Promoting. --Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}