Talk:IMac Pro/GA1
GA Review
{{atopg
| status =
| result = Passed. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
}}
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|David Fuchs}} 22:27, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Crisco 1492 (talk · contribs) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
=Image review=
- :File:IMac Pro.svg - License is correct. Sticklers may say we need a photograph to ensure accurate representation, but looking at other images in the category, this is very representational. I hate that a product can be displayed accurately as an SVG — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
=Prose review=
- languished for years without any updates - While it probably felt like that for Mac users, this feels very purple (and therefore non-neutral). Should be rephrased
- focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) - is this missing an article? Or should dual graphics-processing unit be dual graphics-processing units?
- I've made [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IMac_Pro&diff=1251488503&oldid=1249912174 some edits]; please review.
- [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=iMac+Pro&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 Earwig] gives only 3.8% likelihood of copyvio, flagging only names and other elements that cannot be paraphrased. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
=Source review=
- Per WP:CITESTYLE, we should ensure that the referencing style is consistent. Consequently, the capitalization of the references should be made consistent (compare [1] and [2], [7] and [8], etc.)
- Although it is not a GA criterion and does not affect the results of this review, I recommend archiving your online references to future-proof the article.
- Please ensure references are in numeric order (note [7][6], [22][6], [22][8])
- Spotchecks (based on [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=IMac_Pro&oldid=1251488503 this revision]):
:*[2]
::*Supports: "new Mac Pro being developed", announcement of iMac Pro, small design focus on dual graphics-processing unit (GPU) had been a mistake
:*[5]
::*Supports: same chassis design as the 27-inch iMac (including screen etc.), jacks etc. (not cited for these, but supports them)
:*[16]
::*Supports: discontinuation and delisting; reviewing the article on MacRumours, despite the name it does appear sufficiently reliable for claims such as this.
:*[22]
::*Supports: Svelte frame, quiet, performance worth price
=Conclusion=
- Overall, this article and its presentation are excellent. Just a few nitpicks. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 12:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
:Hey User:Crisco 1492, thanks for the review. I’m currently traveling but will be back at a stable connection in about five days, and will jump in on the changes. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 10:58, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
:*No worries, David Fuchs. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:04, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
::*Hey User:Crisco 1492, sorry for the wait. I believe I've addressed all the comments above. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:24, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
:::*Yes, I believe that does. I'm happy to say that this meets the GA Criteria. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 17:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
{{abot}}