Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 18:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Iceland in the Eurovision Song Contest 2010/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Golden (talk · contribs) 13:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

I'll be reviewing this article. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 13:37, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

{{GAProgress | prose = y | mos = y | reflayout = y | reliablesources = y | originalresearch = y

| copyvio = y | broadness = y | focus = y | neutral = y | stable = y | freeortaggedpics = y

| picsrelevant = y }}

• Add comma after "with the song "Je ne sais quoi""

Everything else is good with the lead and infobox.

Refs #1, #2, and #3 checked – all are reliable and have appropriate information about the sentences they're cited for. No MOS issues in this section either.

• Remove "100%", it's redundant
• I'm not sure if this would be correct to say: "..and had the right to collaborate with foreign songwriters.." based on this sentence from the source: {{tq|Those not meeting the mentioned requirements and wishing to enter the selection process can do so by working in collaboration with an Icelandic national.}} I suggesting splitting that into another sentence and changing it to something like (change to fit your own words): "Non-Icelandic songwriters could also participate in the competition if they joined with an Icelandic singer."
• "RÚV presented the songs on 4, 11 and 18 January 2010 via radio on Rás 2." Source doesn't support this. Maybe you meant "9, 16 and 23 January"?

:{{question}} I forgot where this came from and couldn't find anything when I searched again, so I've removed the sentence. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

• Ref #20 doesn't support the sentence it's cited for (Nothing about volcanos or awareness to Iceland; this is included in Ref #24 however)

:{{question}} Ref 20 has the interview recording link in it and this is discussed during it. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

::Ah, didn't see that. All good then. — Golden ^{call me maybe?}

• bookmakers -> bookmakers

Refs #25 to #46 checked. No further issues with the sources or the MOS in this section.

No issues with plagiarism (checked with Earwig's copyvio detector). Two of the three images in the article are free, while "File:Söngvakeppni Sjónvarpsins 2010.jpg" is non-free but can be used in this article per WP:FUR. No major issues with MOS and sourcing. Ready to pass once the above issues are addressed. — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 15:17, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

:{{replyto|Golden}} Thanks for the review! Everything has been addressed, except for the two comments above. Grk1011 (talk) 17:49, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

::{{reply|Grk1011}} Thanks for the quick fixes. Happy to pass. Congratulations! — Golden ^{call me maybe?} 18:15, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

{{abot}}