Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

I can take a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

{{GAProgress | prose = y | mos = y | reflayout = y | reliablesources = y | originalresearch = y |copyvio = y | broadness = y | focus = y | neutral = y | stable = y | freeortaggedpics = y | picsrelevant = y }}

= Infobox and lede =

  • "and began construction" {{right arrow}} "and construction began" - the subject of the sentence is "It", so current sentence setup makes it look like the highway constructed itself
  • Fixed.

= Route description =

  • Good

= History =

  • "local engineers union" {{right arrow}} "local engineers' union"
  • Fixed.
  • The word "temporarily" is used three times in two sentences in the paragraph beginning "The southern section from 9th Street"
  • Fixed.
  • Missing letter: "1998. he project" {{Right arrow}} "1998. The project"
  • Fixed.
  • "nesting cliff swallow" {{Right arrow}} "nesting cliff swallows", as the source says multiple birds were found
  • Fixed.
  • It feels like there should be another sentence at the end to finish up this paragraph on the 2001-03 construction
  • Reordered to put the project elements last as a wrap-up, and expanded with another sentence on the bird issue.

= Exit list =

  • Good

= References =

  • Good

= General comments =

  • Image is relevant and properly licensed
  • No stability concerns present in the revision history
  • [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Interstate+180+%28Nebraska%29&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 No copyvio concerns]

Just a few quick prose things, plus one area of expansion. Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions or comments. — GhostRiver 16:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

:{{ping|GhostRiver}} Thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. SounderBruce 19:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

::Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)