Login
Login

Talk:Interstate 376/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Interstate 376/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 376/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  3. :: The lead of the article is too long, it should be an adequate summary of the route. The history is a mess, with poor section organization and bulleted lists.
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|nay}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  6. :: There are several statements and whole sections that are unreferenced. In addition "www.pahighways.com" is not a reliable source.
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  9. :: The route description lacks detail for a route of its length
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  12. ::
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  15. ::
  16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  18. ::
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|nay}}

Currently, the article has several issues before it can be considered for GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it. The article may be renominated once the issues are addressed. Dough4872 01:58, 16 March 2011 (UTC)