Talk:Interstate 85 in North Carolina/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|NoobThreePointOh}} 01:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Keresluna (talk · contribs) 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
I will take on this review. Keres🌕Luna edits! 18:38, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you. I will try and add any comments that I have if possible. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|NoobThreePointOh}} Unfortunately, if 2c isn't fixed shortly (like in two days), I am going to have to fail this nomination per WP:GAFAIL. Keres🌕Luna edits! 23:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::@Keresluna Hmmm, I'm looking at 2c, and I'm wondering which sections are uncited. Can you tell me which sections need to be improved? Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:26, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::For example, the whole subsection 'Durham to Virginia' and 'Related routes' are unreferenced. Keres🌕Luna edits! 23:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::::Well, there's not a lot of info on I-85 from Durham to Virginia (very little sources online). I can definitely fix the "Related routes" section, and probably fix the "Durham to Virginia" section as well. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:29, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::@Keresluna File:Yes check.svg Done. I've added sources in the "Related routes" section. I will try and find some for the "Durham to Virginia" section. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 23:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::@Keresluna Alright. I hunted around the web for any reliable sources, and found a lot to help finish the "Durham to Virginia" section by citing the unsourced claims. File:Yes check.svg Done. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 00:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Some more sections which are unrefernced:
:::::::* 2nd paragraph of the section South Carolina to Charlotte
:::::::* Last sentence of the first paragraph of Charlotte to Greensboro.
:::::::* Last sentence of Durham to Virginia.
:::::::Keres🌕Luna edits! 17:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::@Keresluna File:Yes check.svg Done. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 17:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::@Keresluna Let me know if you're still there to finish up the review. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 13:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
style="vertical-align:top;"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|y|Done. }} {{GATable/item|1b|y|Looks fine. }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a source spot-check: {{GATable/item|2a|y|Present. }} {{GATable/item|2b|y| }} {{GATable/item|2c|y| }} {{GATable/item|2d|y|Earwig didn't find anything. }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|y| }} {{GATable/item|3b|y|Okay. }} {{GATable/item|4|y|Looks fine. }} {{GATable/item|5|y| }} |
style="vertical-align:top;"
| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|y|All checked. }} {{GATable/item|6b|y| }} {{GATable/item|7|y| }} |
=Prose=
- 'Traffic from US 321 south prior to 2017' to 'Traffic from US 321 south before 2017', optional, but probably more flowing
- 'A couple miles later, I-85 has an exit' to 'A couple of miles later, I-85 has an exit'
- 'Here, I-85 turns more northward and enters' not sure why more is used here.
- Capitalize mall in 'Concord Mills mall' and wikilink the whole phrase.
- 'They do not enter Kannapolis, but have several exits signed for it.' remove the comma. Keres🌕Luna edits! 14:48, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- :@Keresluna File:Yes check.svg Done. Here are the responses to each one.
- :1. 'Traffic from US 321 south prior to 2017' to 'Traffic from US 321 south before 2017' is fine. I changed that.
- :2. 'A couple miles later, I-85 has an exit' to 'A couple of miles later, I-85 has an exit'. Did that as well.
- :3. For 'Here, I-85 turns more northward and enters', I-85 is mostly going in a northeast direction, and even occasionally in an east direction, but I made the change anyway since it's not much of a big deal.
- :4. 'They do not enter Kannapolis, but have several exits signed for it.' Done with that. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- ::Oop, and I wikilinked "mall" as well. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- 'Because the previous exit is a northbound-only exit,' to 'Because the previous exit is northbound-only,', optional, but would be nice.
- 'cross above the southbound lanes and return to normal direction.' to 'cross above the southbound lanes and return to the normal direction.'
- 'continues to go through wooded forest with no development along' to 'continues to go through a wooded forest with no development along'
- 'provided for 90-percent federal funding of highways that would become' not sure why there is a hyphen.
- Remove all the way in 'Interstate eight lanes all the way to where I-40 turned'. Keres🌕Luna edits! 15:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- :File:Yes check.svg Done NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:03, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
=Verifiability=
Random ref checks:
4: Checks out.
27: Checks out.
39: Checks out. Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:01, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
:4: This one is an official NCDOT map for Cleveland County. The Interstate is a little hard to see on the map of the county, but NCDOT maps are usually reliable sources.
:27: This is also an NCDOT map for Granville County, but shows the bridges instead.
:39: Hendrick Motorsports is a reliable source, I think, and they have several news articles, so I think it counts. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:15, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
=References=
- 'Another section of I-85 opened to traffic on September 9, 1958, when an 11.3-mile (18.2 km) stretch in Mecklenburg County was opened.' is uncited. Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- :@Keresluna File:Yes check.svg Done. There was a source in the NCDOT meeting archive that showed it, so I used that. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:29, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- ::Thank you for your quick replies, I will now pass this article. Cheers! Keres🌕Luna edits! 16:30, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- :::Thank you! :) NoobThreePointOh (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)