Talk:Interstate 95#Infobox revisited
{{Article History
|action1=PR
|action1date=15:42:53 03 February 2008 (UTC)
|action1link=Wikipedia:Peer review/Interstate 95/archive1
|action1result=reviewed
|action1oldid=938730481
}}
{{talk header|search=yes}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|
{{WikiProject U.S. Roads|class=B|importance=Mid|type=I|needs-jctint=NA|needs-map=no|PUSRD-SA=June through October 2006|PUSRD-DYK=April 1, 2013}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 150K
|counter = 1
|minthreadsleft = 1
|algo = old(90d)
|archive = Talk:Interstate 95/Archive %(counter)d
}}
"[[:I-95 exit list]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I-95_exit_list&redirect=no I-95 exit list] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 3#I-95 exit list}} until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I-16
I'm curious what the reason is for listing I-16 in the infobox when I-26, I-91 or I-93 are not. All three are longer than I-16, two of the three terminate at I-95 while I-16 does not, and all are actual interstates that actually travel through multiple states while I-16 does not. ~~ Jessintime (talk) 16:09, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
:@Jessintime: the selection of junctions for the infobox is more of an art than a science at times. In this case, it's there to have a junction within the state of Georgia listed. There have to be some trade-offs to keep under the 10-junction limit, or else the infobox would be overly long. Imzadi 1979 → 16:24, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
::And I-91 shouldn't be listed to give Connecticut representation? ~~ Jessintime (talk) 16:25, 4 April 2025 (UTC)
:::There are more than 10 states along the length, and CT is smaller than GA. Imzadi 1979 → 23:34, 4 April 2025 (UTC)