Talk:Ionian Revolt/GA1

{{al|{{#titleparts:Ionian Revolt/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Ionian Revolt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

GA review of [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ionian_Revolt&oldid=285746544 this version]:
Pn = paragraph n • Sn = sentence n

:GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|aye}}
3. ::
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|aye}}
6. ::
7. ::* Comment: Some of the references are styled pp [page numbers]" (internal space) while the majority are styled pp[page numbers]'' (no internal space). For consistency, they ought all to be the same style. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
8. It is broad in its coverage.
9. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
10. ::
11. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
12. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|aye}}
13. ::
14. It is stable.
15. :No edit wars etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
16. ::
17. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
18. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
19. ::
20. Overall:
21. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|aye}}
22. ::

Excellent article. I only found the most minor of issues and have made those changes myself (primarily relating to colon and semicolon usage). Easily passes on first reading. — Bellhalla (talk) 22:03, 12 May 2009 (UTC)