Talk:Itim/GA2

GA Review

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. Royiswariii Talk! 08:07, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Itim/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Itim/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Mushy Yank}} 16:12, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Royiswariii (talk · contribs) 23:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"

style="vertical-align:top;"

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|k|All grammars and spelling are correct.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|k|~~Better than the first review~~ ~~The lead translation, it should be {{Literal translation|black}}.~~ {{Done}}

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a source spot-check:

{{GATable/item|2a|k|All references are okay.

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|k|All uses of sources are reliable. Although, the lead was have a citations that should not have a citations but some lead needs a citation so it will fine for this as consideration.

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|k|

}}

{{GATable/item|2d|k|No copyvio.

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|k|looks fine and scope of the article was maintained the topic.

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|k|All goods to me.

}}

{{GATable/item|4|k|Meet the WP:NPOV.

}}

{{GATable/item|5|k|no edit war.

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|k|the poster are okay, using fair use rationale.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|k|same as 6a.

}}

{{GATable/item|7|k|~~Wait until {{u|Mushy Yank}} to address the recommendation.~~ The article suitable for Good Article and can be now nominated on WP:DYK or in higher on WP:FA nomination. But I would suggest for a peer review before nominate on FA. If you are not statisfied, just do a reassessment on this. Royiswariii Talk! 08:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

}}

{{Done}} -Hello, Royiswariii and thank you for reviewing this. -Mushy Yank. 13:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

:May I ask? Why did you review the own GA? Talk:Itim/GA1? You know you aren't supposed review your own nomination? Royiswariii Talk! 16:00, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

::Hello, I didn't review my own nomination. I reviewed Kting97's (see User talk:Kting97#Your GA nomination of Itim 2) who seems to have left Wikipedia. (Also see that discussion and my attempt here). Thanks again. -Mushy Yank. 16:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

==Drive-by comment==

Royiswariii, I see you've given each criterion a pass with little to no comment. Could you explain in the Review Comment field what made each criterion a pass? Because I just skimmed through the article and found the Cast section and claim about the positive reception the movie allegedly earned to be uncited, contrary to MOS:FILMCAST and MOS:FILMCRITICS. Please note that content assessment such as a GA review requires giving an article an in-depth review and not merely a rubber-stamp approval (WP:GAN/I#R3); lest, you undermine the GA process and create a culture of complacency. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 03:58, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, Nineteen Ninety-Four guy!

:I checked carefully the article and it's looks good to me, I'll add all my review comment, I didn't check for now because i'm too busy in my academics. Royiswariii Talk! 05:09, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hello, Nineteen Ninety-Four guy! Thank you for your note.

:Unless I am mistaken, MOS:FILMCAST does not indicate cast sections should have cites; from my understanding, just like Plot section, they refer to the film content (credits), unless actors appear with a different name or are uncredited, per MOSCAST "Names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source."/"For uncredited roles, a citation should be provided". See Enola Holmes (film)#Cast (GA), for example. Now, you can add refs if you develop the character's description (See Citizen Kane (FA)) and I will add a reference if you think it's better. Most cast members happen to be cited in another section (Casting). Thanks again -Mushy Yank. 05:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC){{done}}

:I have removed the short sentence about overall positive reception that was indeed meant to introduce the 2 following sentences and contrast it with poor commercial reception. Thanks. -Mushy Yank. 06:23, 21 November 2024 (UTC){{done}}