Talk:Jagdgeschwader III/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Jagdgeschwader III/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Jagdgeschwader III/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 08:20, 6 March 2018 (UTC)

{{collapse-top|GA Criteria}}

GA Criteria:

• 1
• :1.a {{tick}}
• :1.b {{tick}}
• 2
• :2.a {{tick}}
• :2.b {{tick}}
• :2.c {{tick}}
• :2.d {{tick}} (14.5% is highest, due to incidental parallels.)
• 3
• :3.a {{tick}}
• :3.b {{tick}}
• 4
• :4.a {{tick}}
• 5
• :5.a {{tick}}
• 6
• :6.a {{tick}}
• :6.b {{tick}}

{{collapse bottom}}

• No DAB links {{tick}}
• No Dead links {{tick}}

• {{xt|and wanted to assign a fighter wing to each of three attacking Armees.}} suggest you change this to {{Xt|and wanted to assign a fighter wing to each of the three Armees involved in the attack.}}
• Excellent suggestion. Slight rewrite.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
• {{Xt|not to mention frequent changes of airfields during withdrawals,}} suggest {{xt|along with frequent changes of airfields during withdrawals,}}
• Done.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

• {{xt|Flying was kept to a bare minimum. JG III husbanded its resources while awaiting the upcoming offensive.}} suggest {{xt|Flying was kept to a bare minimum, as JG III was husbanding its resources while awaiting the upcoming offensive.}}** Done.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
• {{Ping| Georgejdorner}} That is all of my comments, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:51, 9 March 2018 (UTC)
• Many thanks for a speedy review.Georgejdorner (talk) 17:04, 9 March 2018 (UTC)