Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom/GA1

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. Matthew Yeager (talk) 04:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:James Kirkham Ramsbottom/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Dumelow}} 10:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 04:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

---

Straightforward! Thanks for bringing this over the goal line. Thanks to all the editors that made this an easy nomination.

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. :: Easy to follow, well summarized, and referenced well.
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
5. :a (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}} b (inline citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}} d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. :: Checked references, book searches, and CopyVios
7. It is broad in its coverage.
8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
9. ::
10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. ::
13. It is stable.
14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. ::
16. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
17. :a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
18. ::
19. Overall:
20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
21. ::

{{abot}}