Talk:Jasraj/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Jasraj/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Jasraj/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:30, 19 August 2019 (UTC)

Comments I'm going to have to quick fail this as it is currently tagged with a dispute notice relating to lack of references. I will, however, give you some basic comments on things you'll need to address (as well as the tag) before re-nominating.

• "8 Dec 2016" expand dates out.

:{{done}}

• You mention (and red link) "Pandit Motiram" after you've already referred to him as simply Motiram. Should be the other way round.

:{{done}}

• "happened in this environment...." not encyclopedic tone and needs ref.

:{{removed}}

• It is vitally important to ensure that all awards are referenced reliably, we simply can't attribute awards without verification to an individual.

:{{done}}

• Discog is completely unreferenced and given that all but one of the items listed aren't even red-linked, there's practically no chance of our readers verifying this information.

:{{done}}

Good luck with future endeavours. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:36, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

:{{reply|The Rambling Man}} Many thanks for reviewing and for your useful comments. I will work on those. Regarding the tag, this was added by {{u|Dharmadhyaksha}}. I asked him on the article talk page to be specific as to which statements needed further sourcing, but I didn't ping him (as I thought he was about to do a review and so would see it) and he's not replied. If the issue is the discography section, this is already supported by a general reference. How should I apply a reference that sources the whole of a section, rather than line by line? Can the awards section be referenced to the official Jasraj website or would they need to all be third party? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 07:49, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

::If all discog entries are supported then an easy way to include that is something like "Source:[1]" at the top of the section. As for awards, yes, it would be inappropriate to use a primary source for awards, third party RS would be by far the most appropriate way ahead. The Rambling Man (Staying alive since 2005!) 07:57, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

:::I though you were being sarcastic in asking whats unsourced. There are sections unsourced. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:59, 22 August 2019 (UTC)

::::{{reply|Dharmadhyaksha}} Awards and discography are were sourced in the general references. Curb Safe Charmer (talk)

:::::(section citations now moved to top of the sections) Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2019 (UTC)