Talk:Jeannette Rankin/GA1

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|Yes|This article is well written.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|Yes|I would like to see a use of sources in the lead section, as while many of the points are sourced later on the lead should be sorted as the rest of the article, it currently contains no sources, although this is not a requirement to be given good article status. The other criteria are met to a sufficient standard.

}}

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

{{GATable/item|2a|Yes|The article is sufficiently referenced.

}}

{{GATable/item|2b| Yes |The inline citations are generally good, with a balance of sources of high credibility.

}}

{{GATable/item|2c| Yes |I am confident that this is true, as it is well sourced and leaves no space for original research.

}}

{{GATable/item|2d| Yes |I am confident that this is true, having read through the sources I do not perceive any such violations.

}}

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|Yes|The article sufficiently addresses the topic at hand.

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|Yes|The article does not make unnecessary tangents and remains to the point throughout.

}}

{{GATable/item|4|Yes|The article is neutral.

}}

{{GATable/item|5|Yes|The article is stable.

}}

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|Y|They are in order.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|Y|This is also true, the photos are highly relevant.

}}

{{GATable/item|7|yes|This article meets the criteria of a Good Article, congratulations.

}}