Talk:John Cena/GA1

GA Reassessment

{{al|{{#titleparts:John Cena/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This discussion is transcluded from Talk:John Cena/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

  • It is reasonably well written.
  • :a (prose): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|yes}}

:::The prose is OK, a 6/10.

  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  • :a (references): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|yes}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  • It is broad in its coverage.
  • :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|yes}}

:::The personal life section is small and underdeveloped. This should be expanded and improved if this article is to survive future reviews.

  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  • :a (fair representation): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (all significant views): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  • It is stable.
  • :{{GAList/check|yes}}
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
  • :a (tagged and captioned): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): {{GAList/check|yes}} c (non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|yes}}
  • Overall:
  • :a Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|yes}}