Talk:John Cena/GA1
GA Reassessment
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards,--Jackyd101 (talk) 17:51, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- :a (prose): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|yes}}
:::The prose is OK, a 6/10.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- :a (references): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|yes}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|yes}}
- It is broad in its coverage.
- :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|yes}}
:::The personal life section is small and underdeveloped. This should be expanded and improved if this article is to survive future reviews.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- :a (fair representation): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (all significant views): {{GAList/check|yes}}
- It is stable.
- :{{GAList/check|yes}}
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- :a (tagged and captioned): {{GAList/check|yes}} b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): {{GAList/check|yes}} c (non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|yes}}
- Overall:
- :a Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|yes}}