Talk:K-153 (Kansas highway)/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:K-153 (Kansas highway)/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:K-153 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 06:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
  2. :A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct: {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. ::
  4. :B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation: {{GAList/check|y}}
  5. ::
  6. Is it verifiable with no original research?
  7. :A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline: {{GAList/check|y}}
  8. ::
  9. :B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines: {{GAList/check|y}}
  10. ::
  11. :C. It contains no original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
  12. ::
  13. :D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism: {{GAList/check|y}}
  14. ::
  15. Is it broad in its coverage?
  16. :A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic: {{GAList/check|y}}
  17. ::
  18. :B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style): {{GAList/check|y}}
  19. ::
  20. Is it neutral?
  21. :It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each: {{GAList/check|y}}
  22. ::
  23. Is it stable?
  24. : It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute: {{GAList/check|y}}
  25. ::
  26. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
  27. :A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content: {{GAList/check|y}}
  28. ::
  29. :B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
  30. ::
  31. Overall:
  32. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  33. ::

== Comments ==

  • If possible, add an image.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  06:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  • The ksdot.org links aren't opening. Are they dead? or maybe these aren't visible in India.  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:31, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
  • pinging {{Ping|420Traveler}}  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  16:42, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

::Ill put new citations for this. Its something wrong with the Kansas Department of Transportations website. It been a problem for months. -420Traveler (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

:::Passing the article as per Wikipedia talk:Good articles/Archive 15#Exceeding the criteria for ref formatting  Saha ❯❯❯ Stay safe  20:25, 27 January 2022 (UTC)