Talk:Kangchu system/GA1

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:Kangchu system/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Kangchu system/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have done quite a bit of copy editing of the article. My copy editing should be checked for accuracy to make sure I did not change the meaning.

Mattisse (Talk) 21:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:Thank you. I have schemed through the article, but wish to tell you that "Johor" as a state existed even before the formation of Malaya--nevertheless its good that you helped me to see this fallacy from this angle. Give me a little more time, up to a week and I will update you on this. Mr Tan (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

::Wonderful. Ping me when you are done. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): Well written {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS {{GAList/check|aye}}
  3. ::
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): Well referenced {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): No OR {{GAList/check|aye}}
  6. ::
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): Covers major areas {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): Remains focused on topic {{GAList/check|aye}}
  9. ::
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: Neutral {{GAList/check|aye}}
  12. ::
  13. It is stable.
  14. :No edit wars etc.: Stable {{GAList/check|aye}}
  15. ::
  16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  18. ::
  19. Overall:
  20. :Pass/Fail: Pass {{GAList/check|aye}}
  21. ::

Well done. Congratulations!

Mattisse (Talk) 15:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)