Talk:Kangchu system/GA1
GA Review
Hi, I am reviewing this article for GA and have done quite a bit of copy editing of the article. My copy editing should be checked for accuracy to make sure I did not change the meaning.
—Mattisse (Talk) 21:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
:Thank you. I have schemed through the article, but wish to tell you that "Johor" as a state existed even before the formation of Malaya--nevertheless its good that you helped me to see this fallacy from this angle. Give me a little more time, up to a week and I will update you on this. Mr Tan (talk) 15:18, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
::Wonderful. Ping me when you are done. —Mattisse (Talk) 15:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
GA review (see here for criteria)
- It is reasonably well written.
- :a (prose): Well written {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): Follows relevant MoS {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- :a (references): Well referenced {{GAList/check|aye}} b (citations to reliable sources): Sources are reliable {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): No OR {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- It is broad in its coverage.
- :a (major aspects): Covers major areas {{GAList/check|aye}} b (focused): Remains focused on topic {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- :Fair representation without bias: Neutral {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- It is stable.
- :No edit wars etc.: Stable {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
- Overall:
- :Pass/Fail: Pass {{GAList/check|aye}}
- ::
Well done. Congratulations!