Talk:La Grange Historic District (North Carolina)/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Nominator: {{User|APK}} 09:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: 48JCL (talk · contribs) 00:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello! I am excited to review this article.
It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
- b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): {{icon|ga}} I’m sorry, but the CN tag is an issue for a GAN.
- Fixed. APK hi :-) (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
:Great! That’s a pass. 48JCL (talk • contribs) 16:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources): {{icon|ga}} sources are reliable! Gov websites are working.
- c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{icon|ga}} This was so tedious to do but thats a pass
It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): {{icon|ga}} Contains major aspects.
- b (focused): {{icon|ga}} doesn’t really focus on minor aspects. So pass!
It follows the neutral point of view policy. {{icon|GA}} Nice job! This article strives for the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias: {{icon|ga}}
It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.: {{icon|GA}} Pretty easy pass. Very few authors.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): {{icon|GA}} Yep, images are tagged, that’s a pass
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{icon|GA}} Captions are fine, however, when you say, 130 South Caswell Stret is one of many commercial buildings in need of repair, do you mean street?
Recommend alt text. @APK
Overall: {{icon|GA}}
Pass/Fail: {{icon|GA}}
=Source Check=
Forgot to add this! Pretty short article, took like 30 minutes. Passing!
= Final comments =
PASSING! But please add alt text lol @APK
:Thank you very much. APK hi :-) (talk) 03:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)