Login
Login

Talk:League of Legends/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:League of Legends/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:League of Legends/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khanassassin (talk · contribs) 12:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I have to give this article a quick fail. The lead is too short, the development is almost completly unreferenced, and most of the article is about the gameplay.

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  3. :: Some sections should be written as prose and it does not follow the Manual of Style
  4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|aye}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  6. ::No references in the "Development" section, recognised as "OR"
  7. It is broad in its coverage.
  8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|nay}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|aye}}
  9. ::Fix development, as stated above.
  10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|nay}}
  12. It is stable.
  13. :No edit wars etc.: {{GAList/check|aye}}
  14. :: Seems pretty good.
  15. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  16. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|aye}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|nay}}
  17. ::Other than the boxart, there is nothing. No image of the developers, maybe a screenshot...nothing.
  18. Overall:
  19. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|nay}}
  20. ::As you can see, this article will need A LOT of work before it can pass. Good luck! --Khanassassin (talk) 09:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

=Things to do=

  • The lead - The lead should contain a little of everything. The gameplay, story, development, release, reception...
  • Gameplay - The section should be a bit shortened, since most of the article is about the gameplay. I also spoted a "{{Citation needed|date=February 2012}}" in there.
  • Story - A section dedicated to the story, if the game has one.
  • Development and Distribution - The development section really needs lots of references, and a few could be added the Distribution section
  • Reception - The award table should probably be converted to prose