Talk:Lockheed YF-22/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Lockheed YF-22/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Lockheed YF-22/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk) 01:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

:GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
5. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. ::
7. It is broad in its coverage.
8. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
9. ::
10. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
11. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. ::
13. It is stable.
14. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. ::
16. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
17. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
18. ::
19. Overall:
20. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
21. :: The only initial concern I had was the reliability of Aerospaceweb.org, but after doing a bit of digging, I found [http://www.aerospaceweb.org/about/bios/ this page], which satisfactorily demonstrates the expertise of the authors of the website. Excellent work on this article! Parsecboy (talk) 01:35, 15 July 2011 (UTC)