Talk:Look for the Light/GA1

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:Look for the Light/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Look for the Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Rhain}} 06:46, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: OlifanofmrTennant (talk · contribs) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

I'll take this review Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

:{{Ping|Rhain}} I'll be awaiting your responses. Shouldn't take too much work. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 22:00, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

height=50 \| GA review {{small\|(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)}}
class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; width:50em"
#It is reasonably well written. :a (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check\|{{{1a\|y}}}}} ::Several critics are named as Publication X's "Last name". For instance "Den of Geek's Boo" is mentioned three times, twice as "Den of Geek's Boo" in the last paragraph. Is there a better way to phrase it after the first mention? Perhaps as simply just Boo? :b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check\|{{{1b\|y}}}}} It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. :a (references): {{GAList/check\|{{{2a\|y}}}}} :b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check\|{{{2b\|y}}}}} :: How reliable is EverythingGP, its used a few times. :c (OR):{{GAList/check\|{{{2c\|y}}}}} :d (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check\|{{{2d\|y}}}}} :: A few things mostly just quotes, the episodes title and actor names. It is broad in its coverage. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check\|{{{3a\|y}}}}} b (focused): {{GAList/check\|{{{3b\|y}}}}} It follows the neutral point of view policy. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check\|{{{4\|y}}}}} :: Any negative reviews from good sources? If not is there anything that was critized? It is stable. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check\|{{{5\|y}}}}} It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check\|{{{6a\|y}}}}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check\|{{{6b\|y}}}}} :: Good standerd text and alt text.
style="text-align:center;" \| Overall: Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check\|{{{7\|y}}}}}
height=30\|15px · 15px · 15px · 15px

==Spot checks==

Numbers from this revision [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Look_for_the_Light&oldid=1217247589].Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

16 Good
25 Good
28 Good
32 Good
33 Good
39 Good
46 Good

==Drive by comment==

{{Ping|OlifanofmrTennant}} It has been three weeks since your last edit on this page. Do you plan to continue the review or should it be closed so the article can wait for a different reviewer? -- Zoo Blazer 19:15, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

:Oh sorry I completely forgot, I'll get on with it. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 19:28, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

{{yo|OlifanofmrTennant}} Thanks for the review. To clarify your concerns: {{xt|Den of Geek{{'}}s Boo}} is a little repetitious but I believe it would be inconsistent and potentially confusing to rephrase, and the two uses are far apart anyway; EverythingGP is a local Grande Prairie publication, used here to verify uncontroversial production information; and there are several negative/critical comments in the Reception section, especially the last paragraph. Please let me know if you have any other questions or concerns. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

:I see the scattered negative thoughts. Upon looking through the sources it seems that you've taken as much as you can from the reviews. I specificlly called out Den of Geek at random, regardless I see your point. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 23:49, 28 April 2024 (UTC)