Login
Login

Talk:Magdalena Cajías/GA1

GA Review

{{Archive top}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Magdalena Cajías/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Magdalena Cajías/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: SyntheticSystems (talk · contribs) 21:09, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

=Criteria=

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

{{see|WP:WIAGA}}

A good article is—

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}. Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article.

    : (c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}; and

    : (d) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2d}}.

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.
    6. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:
    7. Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

    : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

=Review=

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (prose)Prose is good.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (b) (MoS)No MoS violations.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (references)References match up what is in the article.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (b) (citations to reliable sources)All statements are sourced.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (c) (original research)No original research.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism)No plagiarism.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (major aspects)All major aspects are covered.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (b) (focused)In-depth coverage but could be better.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

    5. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    Neutral.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.

    6. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    No edit wars.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

    7. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)This could be passed without images but images (with alt text) would be very helpful.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)Needs images.{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}

Sorry for the delay in responding. So, yeah, unfortunately, I was unable to find any public domain images (or many images in general) while creating the article. I'd be happy to update the article with an image if and when a suitable one appears. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 16:34, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

:{{Ping|SyntheticSystems}} How goes it? Krisgabwoosh (talk) 22:11, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

::I will pass this article anyway. SyntheticSystems (talk) 15:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

==Result==

class="wikitable"
ResultNotes
{{GAHybrid/item|pass}}Good.

{{Archive bottom}}