Talk:Marjorie Lynch/GA1

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Marjorie Lynch/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Marjorie Lynch/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 01:50, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

{{pb}}

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.
2. : a. (prose, spelling, and grammar): {{GAList/check|y}}
3. ::
4. ::
5. : b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): {{GAList/check|y}}
6. ::
7. ::
8. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
9. : a. (reference section): {{GAList/check|y}}
10. ::
    1. ::
    2. : b. (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}}
    3. ::
       1. ::
       2. : c. (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
       3. ::
       4. ::
       5. : d. (copyvio and plagiarism): {{GAList/check|y}}
       6. ::
       7. ::
       8. It is broad in its coverage.
       9. : a. (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}}
       10. ::
           1. ::
           2. : b. (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
           3. ::
              1. ::
              2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
              3. : Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
              4. ::
              5. ::
              6. It is stable.
              7. : No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
              8. ::
                 1. ::
                 2. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
                 3. : a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 4. ::
                 5. ::
                 6. : b. (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
                 7. ::
                 8. ::
                 9. Overall:
                 10. : Pass/fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
                 11. ::
                 12. ::

                 (Criteria marked 14px are unassessed)

                 Lead

                 • Linked London
                 • Changed "American Army" to United States Army, as this is how it's referred to in Early life and should be consistent, also linked
                 • Linked Washington DC
                 • Lead is good, no issues. Summarises the body without excessive detail.

                 Early life

                 • Linked London
                 • Linked Paris
                 • Linked Christmas
                 • Source to text integrity for first two sentences of early life using ref [1] is good.
                 • Ditto for first and second sentence of paragraph two
                 • Linked US Army and changed to United States

                 Political career

                 • Source to text integrity for paraph one checks out for the use of ref [9]
                 • Ditto for [17], [20], [25].

                 General Comments

                 • I really struggled to find fault with this one. A few missing links, but this is great work. You certainly practice what you preach about attention to detail and text to source integrity {{u|Sammielh}}! Did not find a single spelling error, and prose is excellent. Learned a lot from you during your review of my work and vice versa. Appreciate it. Thanks! — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 06:18, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

                 {{abot}}