Talk:Max Whitlock/GA1

{{atopg}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Max Whitlock/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Max Whitlock/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MovieTalk101178 (talk · contribs) 19:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA status over the next week. Thank you for nominating the article. MovieTalk101178 (talk) 19:45, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

border="0" cellpadding="10" cellspacing="10" align="center"
align="center"

| style="border: 1px solid #BBB;" width="775pt" | Good Article review progress box

{|

Criteria: 1a. prose ({{GAList/check| y}}) 1b. MoS ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2a. ref layout ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2b. cites WP:RS ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2c. no WP:OR ({{GAList/check| y}}) 2d. no WP:CV ({{GAList/check| y}})
align="center"

| 3a. broadness ({{GAList/check| y}}) 3b. focus ({{GAList/check| y}}) 4. neutral ({{GAList/check| y}}) 5. stable ({{GAList/check| y}}) 6a. free or tagged images ({{GAList/check| y}}) 6b. pics relevant ({{GAList/check| y}})

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked 14px are unassessed

|}

=Lead, info box, and early life=

Nicely written sections. :)

=Career=

2010-11:

  • {{tq|Whitlock won gold on pommel horse and floor exercise and silver in the all-around at the 2010 Junior European Championships held in Birmingham}} - Reference 10 seems to be junior and senior WAG?
  • : Whoops. This is fixed now. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
  • {{tq|He also won the silver medal on the pommel horse}} - I don't see the source mentioning anything about Whitlock’s PH silver but it's possible I'm missing something?
  • : You're right, and I've added another source. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

2012: Ok.

2013: Ok.

2014: Ok.

2015:

2015:

  • {{tq|After the European Championships, his coach announced Whitlock would take a break from training to recover, during which he also cancelled any public appearances and stopped using social media. }} – Looking at the ref, I don't see anything about a social media break (although after tweeting that he resumed training, it's clear that he did take break). :)
  • : I couldn't find a source that he was off social media, so I just took that part out. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

2016: Ok.

2017: Ok.

2018:

  • {{tq|However, an error in his routine on the pommel horse caused him to finish seventh in the event final.}} – Going through the source, I don't see anything about Whitlock finishing 7th?

:*"{{tq|Whitlock, 25, was seventh at the European Championships in Glasgow.}}" -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

2019: Ok.

2021:

  • {{tq|The team took fourth place with a score of 255.76}} – I don't see any final results listed in the ref?

:*I've changed the source. -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

2022-23:

  • {{tq|Whitlock took 18 months off from training}} – I can see ref 76 says 10 months while ref 77 says 18.

:*I can't figure out this discrepancy, so I just changed the language to "took over one year off from training", is that fine? -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

  • {{tq|During the pommel horse final, Whitlock fell and finished fifth. }} – I don’t see any mention of Whitlock placing 5th in the reference?

:*Added source that mentions the 5th place finish -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

=Awards and honours=

  • {{tq|Whitlock finished seventh in the public vote for the 2014, 2015, and 2016 BBC Sports Personality of the Year awards. }} - It looks like Whitlock was 8th in 2015.

:*Fixed -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

=Personal life=

  • {{tq|Their first child, a daughter named Willow, was born on 23 February 2019}} - It doesn’t look like the actual birthday of Whitlock’s daughter is cited in ref 89 unless I’m missing something? It does say February 2019 though. :)

:*Changed to February 2019 -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

=Competitive history=

Ok.

=References=

A few notes on references for future improvement. :)

  • Ref 5 requires subscription but based on the title and publisher, the source is reputable. I can see an archived version from Aug 4, 2026, allows the reader to view the full article.
  • Ref 8 requires subscription but based on the title and publisher, the source is reputable. I can see an archived version from 2016 allows the reader to view the full article.
  • Reference 44 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 52 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 62 requires subscription but the source is reliable based on the publisher.
  • Reference 63 requires subscription but the source is reliable b ased on the publisher.

=Overall comments=

This article is well written and very close to GA level. :) Thank you for nominating the article Riley1012! There are just some small issues (or questions) related to a couple of references. Let me know how it goes. :) MovieTalk101178 (talk) 01:19, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

:* Thanks for the review {{u|MovieTalk101178}}! -Riley1012 (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

:*:Thanks for fixing. :) I'll promote the article now. :) MovieTalk101178 (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)