Talk:Methoxyflurane/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Methoxyflurane/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Methoxyflurane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tea with toast (話) 21:58, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

1) In the "Biodegradation" section, there is a link to diuresis, which is a disambiguation page. I believe it should be directed to polyuria, but rather than make the change myself, I thought I would let you make the change in case you believe it should be otherwise.

:I have changed "massive diuresis" to "vasopressin-resistant high-output renal failure (production of large volumes of poorly concentrated urine)". The toxic nephropathy caused by methoxyflurane occasionally observed after administration of methoxyflurane is a form of nephrogenic diabetes insipidus. DiverDave (talk) 00:50, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

2) There are several problems relating to the references. The following items have broken links:

• Refs 9 and 56
• The first link under "Further readings"
• 2 of the "External links"

:I have removed all of the broken links. DiverDave (talk) 16:37, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Additionally, I think it would be helpful to have doi/pmid id links to many of the items listed under "Further readings". Some tools you might find useful: Template:Cite pmid, Template:Cite doi. They make citing references so much easier!

:All sources in the ==Notes==, ==References== and ==Further reading== sections have been reformatted. DOI, PMID, and PMC links have been added in all cases where they are available. DiverDave (talk) 15:45, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

I will place this article on-hold until these reference issues can be sorted out. If you have any other questions, let me know. --Tea with toast (話) 22:55, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

{{#if:|

---

|}}

1. Is it reasonably well written?
2. :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
3. :: {{#if:||}}
4. :B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists: {{GAList/check|y}}
5. :: {{#if:||}}
6. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
7. :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|y}}
8. :: {{#if:Thanks for all the improvements on the refs!|Thanks for all the improvements on the refs!|}}
9. :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
10. :: {{#if:||}}
11. :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
12. :: {{#if:||}}
13. Is it broad in its coverage?
14. :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
15. :: {{#if:||}}
16. :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
17. :: {{#if:||}}
18. Is it neutral?
19. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
20. :: {{#if:||}}
21. Is it stable?
22. : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
23. :: {{#if:||}}
24. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
25. :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
26. :: {{#if:||}}
27. :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
28. :: {{#if:||}}
29. Overall:
30. :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
31. :: {{#if:||}}