Login
Login

Talk:Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems/GA1

GA Review

{{al|{{#titleparts:Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 17:46, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Featured article tools|1=Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems}}

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: No dabs

Linkrot: No dead links. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:06, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

=Checking against GA criteria=

:GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
  2. :a (prose): {{GAList/check|y}} b (MoS): {{GAList/check|y}}
  3. :: Unlike the previous kits MITS had offered, thousands of calculator orders came in each month. Suggest something like: Thousands of calculator orders came in each month, in contrast to poor results for previous kits that MITS had offered. I assume good faith that you will consider revising this minor grammatical inconsistency as it is really the only problem encountered.

::Fixed. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 23:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

  1. ::Otherwise prose is good, I made a number of minor copy-edits and added some wikilinks.[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Micro_Instrumentation_and_Telemetry_Systems&action=historysubmit&diff=379087111&oldid=369027044]]
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
  3. :a (references): {{GAList/check|y}} b (citations to reliable sources): {{GAList/check|y}} c (OR): {{GAList/check|y}}
  4. :: References check out, I assume good faith for off-line sources
  5. It is broad in its coverage.
  6. :a (major aspects): {{GAList/check|y}} b (focused): {{GAList/check|y}}
  7. :: Broad and focussed.
  8. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
  9. :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
  10. :: Fair and unbiased
  11. It is stable.
  12. :No edit wars, etc.: {{GAList/check|y}}
  13. ::
  14. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
  15. :a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): {{GAList/check|y}} b (appropriate use with suitable captions): {{GAList/check|y}}
  16. :: All OK
  17. Overall:
  18. :Pass/Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
  19. ::OK, I consider this interesting article to be worthy of Good Article status. It could do with the addition of :Template:Infobox company, but this is not a GA requirement. Congratulations and thanks for preparing it so well for GA review. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:08, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
  20. ::