Talk:New England Patriots/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:New England Patriots/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:New England Patriots/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 18:24, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

I'll start this review ASAP. Just before we begin, to sort out confusion, I will have a general review then an in depth prose and source review. In the general review, I'll use the "GA tools" box. I feel pretty bad for the number of times this page has been started and deleted, so I'll try and start/finish this review quickly. MrWooHoo (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

• Please resolve the issues noted [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/view/Peer_reviewer#page:New_England_Patriots here] (besides the first note as this is a GA review). There are a couple of "weasel words" and some footnote punctuation problems. MrWooHoo (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with ::, then use {{tick}} or {{done}}

If the change was only partially done use {{yellow tick}}, and {{cross}} or {{not done}} if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P)

To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.

• "The Patriots played their home games at Foxboro Stadium from 1971 to 2001, then moved to Gillette Stadium at the start of the 2002 season."

:Right now, only 2002 is linked. Link both words of "2002 season" to the 2002 NFL season article.

• "This includes the current teams, the New York Jets, the Miami Dolphins, and the Buffalo Bills, as well as former divisional opponents the Colts."

:Why not say "the Indianapolis Colts" for conformity?

• See the Oakland Raiders subsection.

:Is it necessary for this subsection to be so long? It seems like a play by play summary in the first half of the subsection.

• "On the field, the Patriots have typically utilized an "Erhardt–Perkins" offense and a "Fairbanks–Bullough" 3–4 defense, referred to commonly as a 2-gap 3–4 defensive system."

:See WP:NUMERAL. "Integers from zero to nine are spelled out in words."

• Fix [http://dispenser.homenet.org/~dispenser/cache/wikipedia:en:New_England_Patriots#view=0,0,0,0,1,1 these 10 dead links]. I'd advise Wayback Machine to retrieve old versions. MrWooHoo (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

• Hi {{ping|MrWooHoo}} Just wanted to let you know that I have seen this and will try to get to your suggested edits over the next week or so. Thanks and sorry for the delayed response. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 13:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

:{{ping|Sportsguy17}} I have finished my review, I will now put this review on hold. Take your time. Cheers! MrWooHoo (talk) 03:17, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

• Just passing through, and saw the missing image mentioned above is from an af.mil domain. Ironically, that's the same as a missing image on a recent FAC image review that I did. Sure enough, I was able to locate the new image in the same way. It is now at [http://www.af.mil/News/Photos/tabid/129/igphoto/2000427830/Default.aspx this URL] -- Saskoiler (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

I just cut the Oakland Raiders subsection as unsourced; since that was the remaining issue that hadn't yet been addressed between the many (mostly) abandoned reviews over the past year I'll go ahead and close this. Wizardman 22:38, 6 August 2016 (UTC)