Talk:Nicola Zagame/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 19:50, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
= Review =
=Criteria=
A good article is—
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}. Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article. and
: (c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}.
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.
: (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and
: (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.
=Review=
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.
- {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:
:
class="wikitable" | ||
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result | ||
(a) (prose) | Good. | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
(b) (MoS) | Meets requirements. | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
:
class="wikitable" | ||
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result | ||
(a) (references) | All good. | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
(b) (citations to reliable sources) | All good. | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
(c) (original research) | No problems | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
:
class="wikitable" | ||
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result | ||
(a) (major aspects) | No problems. | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
(b) (focused) | No problems | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
:
class="wikitable" | |
! Notes !! Result | |
No problems | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
:
class="wikitable" | |
! Notes !! Result | |
No problems! | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
:
class="wikitable" | ||
! Criteria !! Notes !! Result | ||
(a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales) | Good! | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
(b) (appropriate use with suitable captions) | No problems | {{GAHybrid/item|yes}} |
==Result==
class="wikitable" | |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
{{GAHybrid/item|yes}} | No problems. |
==Discussion==
I removed the quote about falling on her bum and then the breaking of the chair. It did not seem to set a good tone and is unnecessary. Anything which portrays the subject in a comedic light is typically fine for a news broadcast or light-hearted discussion, but not an encyclopedia article. No other major concerns exist for me, so I am passing it.
=Additional Notes=
{{Reflist}}