Talk:ODB++/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:ODB++/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:ODB++/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ankit Maity (talk · contribs) 08:48, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

A review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?

A. Prose quality:{{GAList/check|aye}}

Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below.

• More sections.
• The article should have a little more context.
• The article seems confusing in the sections under Adoption. You can separate Criticism and Controversy for this reason.

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:{{GAList/check|aye}}

Not too enamored with the mass of links for See also

Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|aye}}

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|aye}}

C. No original research: {{GAList/check|aye}}

Is it broad in its coverage?

A. Major aspects:{{GAList/check|aye}}

B. Focused:{{GAList/check|aye}}

Is it neutral?

Fair representation without bias:{{GAList/check|aye}}

Is it stable?

No edit wars, etc:{{GAList/check|aye}}

Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:{{GAList/check|aye}}

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|aye}}

Overall:{{GAList/check|aye}}

----

Please note that if the article is not improved within seven days the nomination will be rejected.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 12:27, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

: Thanks! I fixed the See also. How is it now? Woz2 (talk) 13:49, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

::Please fix the first point too.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 15:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

: Sorry, I'm confused. Can you clarify? The first point says "Mostly clear, but with possible improvements as pointed below." but I'm not seeing what the word "below" refers to. What am I missing? Woz2 (talk) 16:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

:::Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 16:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

: Thanks! What in particular confuses you? Woz2 (talk) 17:07, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

: Added an Intro section. Does this help? Woz2 (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

::Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 04:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

: Hmmmm... Not sure what to do next... Any thoughts on section headers that would help clarify the article? Woz2 (talk) 12:18, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

: Added "Adoption" section Woz2 (talk) 14:16, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

::Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 15:29, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

: Attempted to clarify Criticism section. Woz2 (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

::Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 05:48, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

: How is it now? Woz2 (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

::Updated.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk • contribs} 12:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

{{archive bottom}}

There was a comment from someone working on incorporating the links as references, so I thought I'd move it here so it doesn't get lost in cleanup: --Ronz (talk) 00:52, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

• https://web.archive.org/web/20110705120048/http://pcdandf.com/cms/designnews/8103-users-updating-adopting-ipc-data-transfer-spec-