Talk:Para-alpine skiing classification/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 21:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
I'll review this but the review likely won't start for at least another 48 hours.♦ Dr. Blofeld 21:04, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
;Lead
- {{tq|i=y|" Some classification systems are governed by bodies other than International Paralympic Committee Alpine Skiing for systems not used in international competition." }}Such as?
- Special Olympics. added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- {{tq|i=y|"intellectual disabilities"}} Mental disabilities?
- No, it is always referred to as "intellectual disabilities"."mentally retarded" has been deprecated for a generation. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
:::Political correctness eh?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- {{tq|i=y|"The first classification systems for para-alpine skiing were developed in Scandinavia,"}} Do we have a year/period for this?
- 1960s. Added. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Link Sit skiers and mono-ski
- The two point to the same article, which duly informs the reader that they are not quite the same thing. Added a link to mono-ski. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
;Definition
- Do LW1, LW2, LW3, LW4, LW5/7, LW6/8, and LW9 have articles? And the C and B class ones? Link them?
- Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- What does Locomotor Winter mean?
- It's just an English word. Linked to the Wiktionary article. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- Remove excessive links to Amputation, Paraplegia and Visual acuity, just once will do.
- Done. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
;Governance
- International Paralympic Committee Alpine Skiing. Link?
- Linked. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
- {{tq|i=y|" ISMWSF In 2003, ISMWSF merged with ISOD, and changed its name to the International Wheelchair and Amputee Sports Federation (IWAS) in 2004."}} Beginning of the sentence doesn't make sense.
- Corrected. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:19, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
{{#if:|
|}}
- Is it reasonably well written?
- :A. Prose quality: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :B. MoS compliance: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- :A. References to sources: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :C. No original research: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- :A. Major aspects: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :B. Focused: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Is it neutral?
- :Fair representation without bias: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Is it stable?
- : No edit wars, etc: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- :A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales: {{GAList/check|y}}
- :B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions: {{GAList/check|y}}
- Overall:
- :Pass or Fail: {{GAList/check|y}}
Article seems to provide a pretty decent overview of this. However, several photographs might help liven it up a little, only if relevant of course.♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:47, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Issues addressed, so article passes. Wizardman 04:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC)