Talk:Para-swimming classification/GA1
GA Review
{{Good article tools}}
Reviewer: Jamesyboy2468 (talk · contribs) 17:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok I'll take this one jamesy boy (2468) 17:51, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
| valign="top"
! width="30" | Rate ! width="300"| Attribute ! | Review Comment |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}: {{GATable/item|1a|y| }} {{GATable/item|1b|y| }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}: {{GATable/item|2a|n|A few more references on the history section would be nice. }} {{GATable/item|2b|y| }} {{GATable/item|2c|y| }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}: {{GATable/item|3a|y| }} {{GATable/item|3b|y| }} {{GATable/item|4|y| }} {{GATable/item|5|y| }} |
| valign="top"
| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}: {{GATable/item|6a|y| }} {{GATable/item|6b|y| }} {{GATable/item|7|| }} |
Comment: There is no move discussion that is ongoing. There is a comment on a talk page, not on the article page. There has been no follow up for a comment about a month old. There is no indication the name will change. This stability issue is a non-issue. What else needs to be addressed? --LauraHale (talk) 20:21, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
::A strange reviewing approach it has to be said..♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:46, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
::: Ok, I suppose that the move discussion does not have a significance. Late night Wikipedia editing... jamesy boy (2468) 15:56, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Comment: There are 19 references in the History section, which is fully referenced. What additional references do you want? Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
The reviewer's now disappeared, so I'm not sure what to do here, whether to pass or put it back in the queue, leaning towards the latter. Wizardman 23:18, 22 November 2012 (UTC)