Talk:Park51/GA2

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Park51/GA2|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Park51/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 17:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

{{collapse-top|GA Criteria}}

GA Criteria:

• 1
• :1.a
• :1.b
• 2
• :2.a
• :2.b
• :2.c
• :2.d
• 3
• :3.a
• :3.b
• 4
• :4.a
• 5
• :5.a
• 6
• :6.a
• :6.b

{{collapse bottom}}

• No DAB links {{tick}}
• No Dead links {{cross}}:
• :Ref 25: "Simone Baribeau; David Levitt; Nicholas Johnston; Stacie Servetah & Mark Schoifet (August 3, 2010). "Ground Zero Mosque Plans Move Forward After Key Vote". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved August 4, 2010."
• :Ref 40: ""Democrats split over ground zero mosque". Hürriyet Daily News. August 17, 2010"
• :Ref 108: "Notice of Petition" Archived 2010-12-03 at the Wayback Machine., Brown v. New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission, Supreme Court of the State of New York, August 4, 2010. Retrieved August 9, 2010."
• :Ref 129: "Caruso, David.AP Exclusive: Backers of NYC mosque appear divided Archived 2010-09-12 at the Wayback Machine., Associated Press. Sep 8, 2010."
• :Ref 164: ""61% Oppose Muslim Cultural Center; But, Majority Willing to Listen" Archived August 15, 2010, at the Wayback Machine., Dr. Don Levy, Siena Research Institute, August 5, 2010. Retrieved August 9, 2010."
• :Ref 186: "Daniel Halper (August 6, 2010). "Three Senators Oppose Ground Zero Mosque". Weekly Standard. Retrieved August 12, 2010."
• :Ref 209: ""Gatestone Institute". Retrieved 8 August 2016."
• ::{{re|Iazyges}} Thanks for taking up this nomination, as well as the five others. I have fixed some of these issues, but Refs 108, 129, and 164 are already archived. epicgenius (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

• {{xt|23 had been deemed landmarks and 6 (including 45–47) were pending as of August 2010.}} suggest {{xt|23 had been deemed landmarks and 6 (including 45–47) had applications pending as of August 2010.}}
• {{xt| New York City has more than 11,000 landmarked buildings.}} suggest removing as the sentence alone is unnecessary.
• {{xt|Muslims had a presence in Lower Manhattan for many years prior to the September 11 attacks. At least two mosques existed near the World Trade Center,[8][69][70] and several designated Muslim prayer rooms existed within the World Trade Center buildings.[71]}} suggest moving this to before the section on 9/11.

• {{xt|As a recruitment tool for radical Islamists}} suggest changing this section title to {{Xt|Opposition as a recruitment tool for radical Islamists}}, as the section is much more about how people opposing the building is offering the recruitment tool, rather than the building itself being one.
• {{Ping| epicgenius}} That is all my suggestions, passing now. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 13:28, 19 March 2018 (UTC)