Talk:Prince Family Paper/GA1

{{al|{{#titleparts:Prince Family Paper/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Prince Family Paper/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall this is a good article, though I do have a couple nitpicks:

• The two sentences on Darwinism (in the lead and body, repsectively) sound virtually identical and therefore repetitive; reword one to mix it up a bit.
• I changed it up a bit, but let me know if you think it needs to be more clear. — Hunter Kahn 02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
• "They didn’t let Michael off the hook. Instead the writers took a dark and dirty turn toward the truly tragic, in the literal sense of the word." <- I'm nitpicky on quotes having cites at the end of the respective sentence, even though I'm positive it uses the same ref as the next sentence. Same with a couple others.
• I think I got them all, but if I missed any let me know. — Hunter Kahn 02:17, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This is all I have though. I'll put it on hold and pass it when it's fixed. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 00:41, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

:Looks good, article passes. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:46, 1 April 2010 (UTC)