Login
Login

Talk:Quintonil/GA1

GA Review

{{atopg

| status =

| result = Passed. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 03:49, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

}}

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Quintonil/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Quintonil/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: {{User|Tbhotch}} 20:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: TrademarkedTWOrantula (talk · contribs) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Snatch! TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 15:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

:@Tbhotch: Finished. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 01:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

class="wikitable" style="text-align:left"
style="vertical-align:top;"

! width="30" | Rate

! width="300"| Attribute

! | Review Comment

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GATable/item|1a|yes|Copyedited article myself, so it should be good now; didn't find any typos.

}}

{{GATable/item|1b|yes|Lead section is of adequate length. Layout is correct per MOS:LAYOUT. Article is not bombarded with words on the WTW list. Fiction and list incorporation policies do not apply.

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}, as shown by a source spot-check:

{{GATable/item|2a|yes|Reference section is available.

}}

{{GATable/item|2b|yes|Plenty o' reliable sources here! We've got coverage from CNN, Time Out, Eater, The Infatuation, Bon Appetit, Restaurant, Bloomberg, and El Universal.

}}

{{GATable/item|2c|yes|Spotchecking proves there is no original research.

}}

{{GATable/item|2d|yes|According to Earwig, the top result is at a 24.8% similarity. While not alarming, a considerable amount of text from the article is quoted. It can be easily paraphrased.

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GATable/item|3a|yes|Broad coverage of the restaurant's description, history, and reception can be found. This is adequate information for an article about a restaurant.

}}

{{GATable/item|3b|yes|Article is focused.

}}

{{GATable/item|4|yes|Article is neutral; it does not try to promote or criticize the restaurant itself.

}}

{{GATable/item|5|yes|Article is stable.

}}

style="vertical-align:top;"

| colspan="3" | 6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GATable/item|6a|yes|Logo is in the public domain. Restaurant is under CC BY 2.0. Rest of the images are freely licensed.

}}

{{GATable/item|6b|yes|While the logo and restaurant building images are relevant, the eleven food images crammed into the description section don't seem to have a purpose. However, this isn't a major obstacle, so I'll let it slide. Captions are suitable.

}}

{{GATable/item|7|yes|Yum!

}}

= Quickfail? =

  • {{Aye}} Article is stable.
  • {{Aye}} Earwig top result: [https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Quintonil&oldid=1229099165&action=search&use_engine=0&use_links=1&turnitin=1 24.8%]. No severe copyright violations.
  • {{Aye}} No mistakes in previous GA reviews to note.
  • {{Aye}} No cleanup banners or citation needed tags.
  • {{Aye}} No glaring errors.

; Comment

  • {{Ping|Tbhotch}} I think this sentence should be moved to the Description section: "It has volcanic stone floors and wood and mirrored walls." ---Another Believer (Talk) 14:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
  • :That's a good idea. TWOrantulaTM (enter the web) 14:28, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

= Lead =

  • {{xt|daily menu restaurant}} - As in the restaurant's menu is changed every day?

:* Yes. Does a term exist in English? Because I only found Menú del día

  • {{xt|that are uncommon to taste in dishes}} - Tried rewording it to "that are uncommon in dishes". That correct?
  • Could remove the citation. The fact is cited later in the article.

:Removed

= Description =

  • "are brought" -> "are sourced"?

:*Changed

  • Should there be a separate section for the gallery?
  • {{xt|Dishes include common ingredients like beans, squash, various chiles, and mushrooms}} - So like, the ingredients are dishes by themselves?

:*Reworded, I think.

  • {{xt|A variation of the Mole Madre sold at Pujol is also available.}} - Not sure why this is mentioned if the reader doesn't know what the dish is.

:*I linked it to the mole itself

  • {{xt|The wine menu is mainly European, with Mexican variants,}} - Does that mean the wine mostly comes from Europe?
  • Are the Mexican beverages on the wine menu?

:*Reworded, I think, for both.

  • Was the Entomophagy Festival a one-time thing? If so, when did it happen?
  • {{xt|but business casual is commonly seen}} - Seems travel guide-esque or like a piece of advice you're trying to give to the reader. Should this be removed?

:* I removed the statement.

= History =

  • Not sure why we need a link to "high school"
  • {{xt|and they became a couple}} - Kinda feels awkward and unnecessary to squeeze this detail in. It doesn't sound right to me.
  • Cut "according to them"
  • {{xt|into their homes like friends}} - Don't you mean neighbors?

:* Reworded, for these three points.

  • {{xt|they even lived on the second floor of the restaurant for five years}} - I'm not sure if this is what directly inspired them to open a restaurant with a "family concept". It seems like trivia to me.
  • {{xt|contribute to the menus with their reimagining of Quintonil's recipes}} -> "...provide new dishes"?

:* Reworded

= Reception =

  • {{xt|infrequent vegetables and herbs}} - What?
  • Tried replacing the Bon Appetit sentence with an actual quote from the source. Not sure if that works.
  • Shouldn't the Restaurant magazine ranks go in chronological order?

= Spotchecking =

  • Five sources. Go! (References of [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Quintonil&oldid=1232678412#cite_ref-tourmag_6-0 this revision].)
  • #6 {{Nay}} - Neither this source nor #7 mentions the nine-course tasting menu or the a la carte menu.
  • #10 {{Aye}} {{Aye}} {{Aye}}
  • #18 {{Nay}} - Doesn't really mention the "cooking style" part
  • #25 {{Aye}}
  • #29 {{Aye}}
  • :Changed and reworded. (CC) Tbhotch™ 03:35, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

{{abot}}