Login
Login

Talk:Radish/GA1

GA Review

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Radish/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Radish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: StudiesWorld (talk · contribs) 00:59, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

=Criteria=

Good Article Status - Review Criteria

{{see|WP:WIAGA}}

A good article is—

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}. Compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style, or the Manual of Style mainpage or subpages of the guides listed, is not required for good articles.

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}};

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}};Either parenthetical references or footnotes can be used for in-line citations, but not both in the same article. and

    : (c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}.

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}};This requirement is significantly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required of featured articles; it allows shorter articles, articles that do not cover every major fact or detail, and overviews of large topics. and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}.

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.
    6. Vandalism reversions, proposals to split or merge content, good faith improvements to the page (such as copy editing), and changes based on reviewers' suggestions do not apply. Nominations for articles that are unstable because of unconstructive editing should be placed on hold.

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:
    7. Other media, such as video and sound clips, are also covered by this criterion.

    : (a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}; and

    : (b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}.The presence of images is not, in itself, a requirement. However, if images (or other media) with acceptable copyright status are appropriate and readily available, then some such images should be provided.

=Review=

  1. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

    2. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (prose)I have made sure that this is a original article.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}
    (b) (MoS)I have reviewed the article and it fits the manual of style criteria.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}

  2. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

    3. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (references)I have reviewed that this has a proper list of sources.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}
    (b) (citations to reliable sources)I have verified that all citations are of reliable sources.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}
    (c) (original research)There is one paragraph under Other Uses which may be original research. Other then that everything is well sourced.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}

  3. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

    4. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (major aspects)It covers all major aspects of the Radish{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}
    (b) (focused)It stays focused throughout most of the article. Although in the Uses section it goes a bit broader then I believe is necessary.{{GAHybrid/item|neutral}}

  4. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

    5. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    The article is not biased and maintains a Neutral Point of View.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}

  5. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.

    6. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Notes !! Result

    There is no edit warring currently occurring. Although two instances of vandalism have occurred in the last 13 days.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}

  6. {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

    7. :

    class="wikitable"

    ! Criteria !! Notes !! Result

    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)I have verified that all images are used under the proper licensing.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)All caption are suitable for the article.{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}

==Result==

class="wikitable"
ResultNotes
{{GAHybrid/item|yes}}Overall this article definitely deserves good article status. I think it could use some improvement in the Uses section but other than that it is great.

==Discussion==

Thank you for undertaking this review. I will trim the "Uses" section a bit. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:38, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

=Additional notes=

{{Reflist}}