Talk:Ridgedale Center/GA1

{{Good article tools}}

{{al|{{#titleparts:Ridgedale Center/GA1|-1}}|noname=yes}}
:This review is transcluded from Talk:Ridgedale Center/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 11:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1}}:

{{GAList/check|aye}} With the issues listed below addressed, this article now fully complies with MOS policies concerning grammar, along with general layout/formatting. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

:(a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1a}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

:(b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|1b}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2}}:

{{GAList/check|aye}} The article is well-referenced with reputable sources; the content is not left in want of citations. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:40, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

:(a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2a}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

:(b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2b}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

:(c) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|2c}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3}}:

{{GAList/check|aye}} The article appears to cover all encyclopedic aspects of its topic for which reliable information could be accessed. All areas of the topic are balanced and devoid of cruft. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

:(a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3a}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

:(b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|3b}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|4}}.

{{GAList/check|aye}} The article keeps a consistently neutral tone, throughout. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|5}}.

{{GAList/check|aye}} Since it's creation a near 9-1/2 years ago, there has been no disruptive editing within this article. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:21, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6}}:

{{GAList/check|aye}} As mentioned on the information page for the image used in the article, it is (at present) irreplaceable with regards to the purpose it serves, and is furthermore adequately equipped with license and fair-use rationale. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

:(a) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6a}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

:(b) {{Wikipedia:Good article criteria/GAC|6b}}{{GAList/check|aye}}

• "2007–present: Renovations and Nordstrom opens": Nothing in this section mentions that a Nordstrom outlet has officially opened at this mall, to-date. Since the concept of a Nordstrom store is still inherently central to this section, and in keeping with the titles of the sections above it, I would suggest omitting "opens" from the header.

{{done}} Carbrera (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

• I find myself confused by the line, "... these plans allowed both Macy's current anchor of {{convert|202000|sqft|m2|sigfig=2}} to combine into one larger, {{convert|286000|sqft|m2|sigfig=2}} location." Where does the "both" tie in? If Macy's had 202,000 square feet before the combination, where did the other 84,000 square feet come in? Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

{{done}} I have reworded the line accordingly. Carbrera (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

:* {{ping|Wilhelmina Will}} I have made all my changes, thank you. Carbrera (talk) 15:52, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

::Thank you! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

{{GAList/check|aye}} The article qualifies as GA. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)